Resources
Search our resources
Or filter resources by
Country/region
- Afghanistan 2
- Africa 34
- Americas 3
- Asia 11
- Bangladesh 3
- Belarus 1
- Burkina Faso 3
- Caribbean 7
- Chad 1
- Colombia 3
- Cote D'Ivoire 1
- DRC 1
- Dominica 2
- Ethiopia 3
- Europe 10
- Fiji 6
- Global 59
- Guinea 1
- Haiti 4
- Hati 1
- Horn of Africa 8
- Indonesia 1
- Iraq 1
- Kenya 10
- Libya 1
- Malawi 1
- Middle East 9
- Morocco 2
- Mozambique 4
- Myanmar 3
- Nepal 3
- Niger 2
- Pacific 19
- Pakistan 4
- Palestine 3
- Papua New Guinea 10
- Philippines 6
- Sierra Leone 1
- Somalia 3
- South Sudan 2
- Southeast Asia 7
- Sudan 8
- Syria 3
- Turkiye 3
- Ukraine 6
- Vanuatu 5
- Yemen 1
- Zimbabwe 1
Topic
- #safeai 4
- #safeaihumanitarianengagement 1
- #safeaiparticipation 3
- AI 10
- CDAC Public Forum 13
- COVID-19 12
- DEPP 7
- Digital security 2
- Ebola 1
- Lebanon 1
- Local Lifelines 3
- Myanmar 2
- National Platforms 9
- PSEA 2
- SMS 2
- Sudan 4
- accountability 47
- capacity bridging 15
- cholera 2
- climate 11
- co-design 3
- communication 110
- community engagement 80
- conflict 21
- coordination 52
- cyclone 3
- development 1
- digital 33
- digital hygine 1
- disability 2
- disaster 41
- displacement 14
- drought 3
- earthquake 14
- feedback 7
- financing 5
- floods 3
- harmful information 2
- health 16
- hotline 1
- hurricane 2
- inclusion 11
- information 71
- information integrity 10
- journalism 31
- localisation 28
- media 50
- media development 3
- misinformation 9
- needs assessment 7
The governance gap in humanitarian AI: addressing the structural gap between global frameworks and operational reality
AI governs who gets aid, yet the humanitarian sector has no shared framework to govern AI. SAFE AI’s inaugural briefing establishes why the governance gap is structural, why global frameworks don't translate to humanitarian realities, and what independent assurance must look like.
How-to note: Co-designing AI solutions with crisis-affected communities
This how-to note from the SAFE AI Project provides practical guidance for co-designing AI solutions with crisis-affected communities – bridging the divide between humanitarian and technological co-design practices. It aims to improve the delivery of responsible and ethical AI solutions in humanitarian contexts.
Policy brief: Addressing power dynamics in participatory AI for crisis-affected communities
This case study from the SAFE AI Project examines real-world challenges in implementing participatory AI through a groundbreaking pilot in Kakuma Refugee Camp and Kalobeyei Settlement.
Co-design vs. User-Centred Design for AI Solutions
This factsheet from the FCDO-funded SAFE AI Project provides practical guidance for humanitarians working with AI to understand two different approaches to participation in AI development.